On 1/1/14 11:34 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 12:13:31PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote: >> ps. My own suggestion is Experimental. > Please, no. That status has been abused enough. What would you be > trying to learn by this experiement? What would the conditions be > that you would conclude you knew the answer? If you can't answer > those questions, "Experimental" is just wrong. I'd actually be fine with experimental, to the extent that it provided background for some experiments with trying to find a workable framework for evaluating snoop-resistance in IETF specifications. I'm less good with publishing a BCP that's neither "best" nor "current" nor "practice." Melinda