Re: Concerns about draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-05 becoming a Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 31, 2013, at 4:12 AM, t.p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it Quebecois, Canadian, American, IETFian...  ?  I do not
> know and cannot imagine it conveying anything to someone who is new to
> the IETF and is not a native English speaker!

It's jargon.   I suspect at this point most native english speakers who read IETF documents would understand what it means, but I see no reason to think that non-native speakers would, and I assumed it was removed for that reason.   I think it's fine to leave it out, but would be curious to hear from some non-native speakers as to what they think about it.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]