>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Brim <scott.brim@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Scott> In that first paragraph, I would prefer to say "privacy"
Scott> rather than "pervasive monitoring". Vulnerability to
Scott> pervasive monitoring is just one way in which privacy
Scott> problems show themselves. It shouldn't be the only angle from
Scott> which the problems are viewed.
Yes, but I don't think a general privacy requirement is appropriate for
this document.
Here, we're trying to document a consensus that we want to look at
specific attacks when people monitor at a bunch of points, combine data,
etc.
That's more specific than privacy, and that specific question is one I
want WGs to answer.