Stephen, On 12/13/13 2:04 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Anyway, how's this for a suggestion, say placed somewhere near > the end of section 2: > > Working groups and other sources of IETF specifications > need to be able to describe how they have considered > pervasive monitoring, and if the attack is relevant to > their work, to be able to justify related design > decisions. > > This does not mean that a new "pervasive monitoring > considerations" is required in Internet-drafts or > other documentation - it simply means that, if asked, > there needs to be a good answer to the question "is > pervasive monitoring relevant to this work and if so > how has it been addressed?" > > Thank you, that is precisely the sort of text I was looking for. Eliot