Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:14:42 +0200
Cc: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CALo9H1ZkR171OV4+9pXneYkzANEZr3DcAJq7NsOBa=makf4M-Q@mail.gmail.com>

For information: I am taking this draft to IESG discussion in the next telechat (Dec 19th). One of the points of discussion will be the issue of anti-harassment text from Dave vs. treating it separately.

Jari

References:
- I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt
  - From: Ines Robles
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt
  - From: Arturo Servin
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt
  - From: Arturo Servin

Prev by Date: Re: [perpass] comments and questions for the group on draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02
Next by Date: Re: [AVTCORE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-avt-srtp-not-mandatory-14.txt> (Securing the RTP Protocol Framework: Why RTP Does Not Mandate a Single Media Security Solution) to Informational RFC
Previous by thread: Re: I-D Action: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-04.txt
Next by thread: Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: ACTN -- Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]