Re: The "nomap" Network Identifier Suffix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



More of a reason for it to be at the 802.11 level, not SSID. Say what we mean, not just a hint.

On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> In message <B939184E-AE28-44CE-A6E5-80EDB34E32CD@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ted Lemon writes
> :
>> On Nov 26, 2013, at 11:52 PM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> And it has the same problem as do-not-track, there's no way to tell
>>> whether people you don't trust are following it.
>> 
>> I thought the point was for it to advise network geolocation survey bots
>> that the hotspot with this ssid is mobile and can't be used for
>> geolocation.
>> 
> 
> The point was for it to advise network survey bots that the hotspot
> with this ssid can't/shouldn't be recorded in any database.
> 
> There are reasons to set this other than the ap is mobile.
> 
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]