In article <3D4E298A-FE87-4FD1-BCC2-EF33E7BD4D99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you write: >Tastes like the �evil� bit, in reverse. And it has the same problem as do-not-track, there's no way to tell whether people you don't trust are following it. Do-not-track is sort of modeled on do-not-call, which is self documenting in the sense that if someone ignores it, you can tell because your phone rings and it's a telemarketer. But if they ignore do not track or do not map, you can tell, how? Suspiciously relevant ads on your device? This is worse than nothing because it gives naive people a false sense of control. Real control is fine, knowing you don't have control is tolerable, thinking you do when you don't is bad. R's, John