Hi Arturo,
At 16:39 06-11-2013, Arturo Servin wrote:
I do not think it is a call for the shepherd to decide to add it or
not, but to us as a group.
The document shepherd is there to see that the issues are
addressed. What I meant was that if I do not address an issue the
document shepherd could, for example, tell me "you forgot to address
X", or "there is agreement to add text about Y and you did not do it".
Also, I do not see why included the text or not will stop somebody
to sued the IETF, but I am not a lawyer.
I don't know the implications.
And, as recent events of discussions about harassment, I am firmly
believe that this issue has to be addressed in the draft, if not as
a whole policy at least to mention that any type of harassment
(sexual, racial, etc.) should not be done.
There is a policy at
http://www.ietf.org//iesg/statement/ietf-anti-harassment-policy.html
I welcome any comments about how to fill the gap is the policy is
considered as inadequate.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy