On 2013-10-29 21:46, Bradner, Scott wrote:
see rfc 2418 page 3 as well as RFC 2434 page 3 for an example of non-protocol uses of 2119 terms fwiw - I have seen 2119 terms used in registration type RFCs for rather many years I think it is too late to unwind that clock Scott Scott Bradner
Well yes, I've seen that too.But there *is* confusion about whether it's the right approach, and it would be really cool if there was some consistency with respect to this.
Best regards, Julian