seems to me to be completely reasonable to say MUST include the number of the RFC that describes the protocol being registered (for example) Scott On Oct 29, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote: > So, > > while getting IETF LC comment for httpbis, one reviewer complains about the use of RFC2119 in registration procedures, while another one complains about the lack of them in a different place. > > Can we please clarify what's the right approach? > > Best regards, Julian > > /me thinks RFC2119 do not belong there. Scott Bradner Harvard University Information Technology Innovation & Architecture +1 617 495 3864 1350 Mass Ave., Room 760 Cambridge, MA 02138 www.harvard.edu/huit