Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "ietf@xxxxxxxx list" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored]
From: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 05:04:36 -0500
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20131022210808.0db07578@resistor.net>

What part of this endless amplification of noise contributes to "make the Internet work better" ?

-Jorge

References:
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
  - From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored]
  - From: SM

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
Next by Date: Re: Internet standardisation remains unilateral
Previous by thread: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with [censored]
Next by thread: Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars.techno.cat@xxxxxxxxx
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]