Hi Jordi,
At 15:01 22-10-2013, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
I may have worded out too quickly my email, and actually looks like it was
more important for my decision the anonymity issue vs the off-top
question, but is still my opinion that this address must be banned.
We could take a decision on future anonymous postings, if required, I'm
always pro-privacy, but I don't think this is applicable in IETF works,
and this include exploders. Again this is my personal point of view.
There was a decision to ban (see above) an email address because of
two messages sent to the mailing list. I read the mailing list
archive and did not find any warning. The advice given was:
"If you decide to identify yourself, as the rest of the posters, and be
on-topic, you will be allowed to post again."
I read the quoted text (see above). I cannot tell which part of it
is a personal opinion and which part is the opinion of the
sergeant-at-arms. The decision comes out as "I don't like what you
said. The explanation for my decision might not be that good but I
already made up my mind". The rest of the posters do not identify
themselves unless a person considers that [local-part]@gmail.com
conveys any meaningful information.
Regards,
-sm