Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:44:23AM +0800,
 IETF Chair <chair@xxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 104 lines which said:

> The IETF should be an open and accessible body in which any
> individual feels able to participate without fear of oppression or
> harassment.

I agree with the goal, and with the mean (having a anti-harrasment
policy). I have one question before agreeing to everything:

> IETF meetings, virtual meetings, and mailing lists are intended for
> professional collaboration and networking. The IETF strives to
> create and maintain an environment in which people are treated with
> dignity, decency, and respect.  Those who participate in the IETF
> are expected to behave according to professional standards

The (ab)use of the term "professional" seems to imply that harassement
outside of the work place is normal, and worse, it could imply that we
fight harassment, not because it is wrong or illegal, but because it
is against the standards of the corporations. Why not simply say that
"Those who participate in the IETF are expected to behave as civilized
people"?





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]