Re: NOMCOM - Critical shortage of nominees for multiple areas

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eggert, Lars <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    >> in your model you don't count those people who have been rejecting to a nomination, 
    >> just because they believe the current AD did a very good job and he/she should be reelected.

    > that is not a good reason to turn down a nomination!

    > It's normally not known whether the incumbent can/will continue. Even
    > if it is known, stuff happens, sometimes late in the process, and the
    > incumbent needs to drop out. If there are no other candidates, we then
    > need to go into panic mode. 

Or, the incumbent gets moved laterally.
Or, in the case if the IAB, an existing IAB member (non-incumbent) gets
"poached" for another position.
Or, the nomcom has reasons to remove the incumbent, or limit their term.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
	

Attachment: pgpBCeBK9YshY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]