Dear Abdussalam, Many thanks for your review and suggestions. The changes you proposed have been integrated in -05 (see http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile-05). As for your question about IP mobility, this is not relevant in the context of this document. Mobility is managed following 3GGP specific procedures. Cheers, Med De : v6ops-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:v6ops-bounces@xxxxxxxx] De la part de Abdussalam Baryun Reviewer: Abdussalam Baryun Date: 26.08.2013 As per the IESG request for review dated 19.08.2013 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I support the draft, thanks, below are my comments, Overall> The draft is about 3GPP Mobile Devices but the draft has no normative reference to such device. The title of the draft SHOULD mention that it is general profile or a proposal, where the abstract says *specifies an IPv6 profile* which means not general, so the title SHOULD say *An IPv6 profile*. Also the draft does not consider Mobile IP issues nor RFC5213 into requirements. From the doc the reviewer is not sure does the draft consider MANET issues or not needed for such devices or such connections? Abstract> This document specifies an IPv6 profile for 3GPP mobile devices.AB> suggest> this document defines an IPv6 profile.... The document is missing an applicability statement section, which may be found in one paragraph in section 1.1, but the reviewer would like more details because the document is some how saying it is general requirements. AB On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:52 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
|