I didn't see your previous review for some reason. I can't respond in full now as I'm about to travel, but I will over the long weekend (unless Andrew gets to it first).
I was asked to review the 08 version but my comments from 07 were not addressed and I did not see any response. So I am resending my previous review
As for making it a standard track document, I am not sure since it looks to me as an overview and not standard. And there is no normative language in the document.
Roni Even
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-repute-model-07
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2013–8–20
IETF LC End Date: 2013-8–29
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
I was wondering why the “Further Discussion” section 9.3 is part of the security section. I think it should be a separate section.
Nits/editorial comments:
Section 3 the end of 2nd paragraph “mechansisms” to “mechanisms”