On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I think Deans point is precisely that it is _not_ a topic that can be restricted to the perpass list.
> Interesting stuff, but more on-topic for the perpass list:
Yes and yes. Every protocol needs privacy considerations, and such considerations SHOULD be discussed in every WG. But we also need a place where we can talk about them in general, and that's perpass.
One of the major points a WG should ensure is that a protocol does not _limit_ the privacy possibilities in the environment it is part of. That's not easy, but see RFC 6973 for a start.
Scott