Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

["Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@xxxxxxxxx>]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-12

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2013–8–28

IETF LC End Date: 2013-9–4

IESG Telechat date:

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC.

 

 

Major issues:

Minor issues:

I am not clear on the sub-TLV in section 6.2

1. If a new sub-TLV is defined for TLV type 1 do they need also to be added to TLV type 21. This should be clear, and if there is some relation I think it should be reflected in the IANA registry for TLV type 1
2. For the vendor or private use why a difference policy than the rest of the sub-TLV registry

 

Nits/editorial comments:

1. In section 3.4 I assume that “TC” is traffic class. It will be good to expand and have reference.