SM The past discussions on this took place a couple of years ago involving primarily Cullen Jennings, Dale Worley and myself. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:20 AM Central Standard Time To: Mary Barnes <mary.h.barnes@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: John C Klensin <john@xxxxxxx>; tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Last call: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16.txt Hi Mary, At 07:28 27-08-2013, Mary Barnes wrote: >As far as the IPR, as the shepherd and DISPATCH WG co-chair, I >posted a note to the DISPATCH WG mailing list before progressing >this document to see if anyone had any concerns about the IPR >disclosures, which had been discussed in the past and were updated >when I asked the authors the requisite questions about IPR while >doing the PROTO write-up. No concerns were raised with regards to >the updated IPR disclosures (i.e., no one responded to that >email). And, you can google "draft montemurro ietf ipr >archives" to find past discussions such as this one: draft >montemurro ietf ipr archives Thanks for the feedback. Somebody commented that: "It has nothing to do with IPR which was extensively discussed on the dispatch list." I read the DISPATCH mailing list archives. I did not see that extensive discussion. My comment was about that. I do not have any problem with the document shepherd comments. Regards, S. Moonesamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.