On 7/29/13 4:54 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >There are existing specs that does what CBOR does just as well that have >actual users. Some of these were approached, and none of them thought that having a standard for their format was worth the amount of heartache that dealing with the IETF would entail. If you can get one of those communities interested, that would be cool. > There are requirements that the individuals proposing this chose not to >address. Re-enumerating those for this discussion might be useful. -- Joe Hildebrand