RE: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > We have submitted a new revision of the draft, addressing one comment
> > from Adrian during IETF LC (which we wanted to address in the previous
> > revision, but forgot about it). We added a new section that can
> > trigger future work, as requested by Adrian.
> 
> I don't see that Adrian requested a future work section, could you
> refer to his input for that or was that private request. May be
> comments in last call made you think to add missing information as
> future. What is the reason for future work in this informational
> draft?

Abdussalam,

Look and ye shall see. Seek and ye shall find. 

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15423.html
> 2. Please consider adding a short section that may drive new work by
>   suggesting which threats need to be addressed in new protocol work,
>   which in deployment, and which by applications.

Adrian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]