Re: Issues in wider geographic participation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hola Arturo,
At 05:17 27-05-2013, Arturo Servin wrote:
Also, it would be important that the "local" people/helpers could do an introduction to what it is the ietf, how to send comments in the remote participation, to the list, what's a WG etc. It may sound a bit bureaucratic, but if we want to have these remote people to start sending emails, comments, reviewing draft we need to break the "ice" somehow. It does not have to be extensive, a short intro could be enough.

I like what you said about breaking the ice. As mentioned above, having local people would help. There is a Newcomers tutorial which explains what is a working group, what is the IETF, etc.

Joel Jaeggli mentioned that a regional NOG is not fertile ground for new IETF participants. Is LACNOG fertile ground for new IETF participants?

The "sending email, comments, reviewing draft" is the really difficult part. My uneducated guess is that it would takes months of work. It's not as negative as it sounds if you consider that overcoming the barrier of entry might usually take over a year.

Could you ask the people who attended the talk ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_zacX9DcZA ) to provide some feedback about it to edu-discuss mailing list?

Regards,
-sm




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]