Re: Issues in wider geographic participation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/27/13 11:15 AM, SM wrote:
> 
> Joel Jaeggli mentioned that a regional NOG is not fertile ground for new
> IETF participants.  Is LACNOG fertile ground for new IETF participants?

	I guess so.

	We have doing some efforts in the past and we are planning to do more.
You will see some recurrent participants to both places (ietf and lacnog).

> 
> The "sending email, comments, reviewing draft" is the really difficult
> part.  My uneducated guess is that it would takes months of work.  It's
> not as negative as it sounds if you consider that overcoming the barrier
> of entry might usually take over a year.

	It is no negative in deed. It is just plain hard.

> 
> Could you ask the people who attended the talk (
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_zacX9DcZA ) to provide some feedback
> about it to edu-discuss mailing list?

	Sure, I will do that.

Regards,
as




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]