Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On May 3, 2013, at 10:20 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Well said, Thomas. 
> 
>> Two concrete suggestions:
>> 
>> 1) have WGs do the managing role more proactively

Provide WG Chairs the monitoring tools they need to be proactive - Action Tracker, what do I need to do today data tracker  views.  Same for AD. 

Same for authors and their mentors, if any. 

Ray


>> 2) mentor authors and others a bit more to encourage them how best to
>> operate
> 
> Which I suspect means...
> 
> 0) have ADs manage/mentor the WG chairs more proactively.
> 
> Almost certainly a case of "if I had less work to do I would have more time to
> do the things that would reduce my workload."  :-)
> 
> WG chairs might like to comment, but I suspect that one lunchtime training
> session every four months does not constitute proactive management.
> 
> Adrian
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]