Re: Language editing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 5/2/13 4:03 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 02:40 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>> As a non-native English speaker, but a language pedant
>> nonetheless, I can empathize with people who put Discusses on
>> badly written documents.
> 
>> I suggest that we budget for a number of WG drafts per year (say,
>> 20 IETF-wide) to go through professional, paid-for heavy-duty
>> editing, with these goals in mind:
> 
>> - Improve the readability of some of published documents, because
>> if a document is *really* badly written, even the RFC Editor team
>> will not save it. - Improve the level of review, because people
>> can understand the document better if they don't need to dig
>> through incorrect or "strange" language. - Allow more non-native
>> speakers to participate in our primary activity (back to our
>> "diversity" discussion).
> 
>> I would suggest that the editing step should take place just
>> before WG Last Call, upon a request by a WG chair and with AD
>> approval.
> 
> An alternative would be to have the RFC-editor doing copyediting of
> I-Ds for a fee.  Depending on the cost, I would use such service
> for my I-Ds.  That would be good for everybody:  I would spend less
> time trying to make my text legible and more making the protocol
> described in it better.  And because the document would have been
> copy-edited by the same people that will publish the RFC, that's
> less work at the end.

Instead of imposing even more work on the RFC Editor team, I suggest
that you find someone in the WG, in your company, in the IETF
community (etc.) to help with the language issues. I did this recently
with a document in one of the WGs where I'm active and it worked quite
well (especially if the document is under source control and you can
just send a patch).

Peter


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=JEpp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]