Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/1/13 11:27 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On May 1, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/1/13 10:39 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>>> On May 1, 2013, at 18:33, Michael Richardson
>>> <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> we need to create a new category of document which amounts to 
>>>> "fully baked ID"
>>> 
>>> Yes.  (I'm not sure it's a category, it might just be a stage.)
>> 
>> Isn't that Proposed Standard?
> 
> No, it very clearly isn't. To get from "the last version of this
> draft" to "Proposed Standard" takes many months, significant
> involvement of an AD, and some involvement of all ADs. All of that
> has costs.

Sorry: oughtn't that be Proposed Standard?

Peter




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]