Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I struggle to engage in this debate because in general I'm not sure how my voice helps advance the general discussion.  But I do want to make two points:

On 4/12/13 8:33 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
I think it's unintentional [...]

  1. As others have said there are many forms of bias in play, which may require different forms of redress.  I expect we can be more successful in some areas than others.
  2. Let's be careful with using words like "unintentional".  For all we know there may be very good reasons that led to the results of this year.  This is not something I would expect to come out of a NOMCOM report, by the way, due to their confidentiality requirements.  And there is where I think we are most wrapped around the axle.
In any case, hard as it may be, we as a community have identified a huge concern, and it would be regrettable if we didn't explore that concern and try to find areas in which we could improve.  I claim  that doing so will improve the IETF in the longer term.

Eliot

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]