On 4/12/13 4:32 PM, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 4/12/2013 11:28 AM, Arturo Servin wrote: >> But if a single individual of the IESG can technically challenge and >> change the work of a whole WG and the IETF, then we have something wrong >> in our process because that means that the document had a serious >> problem and we didn't spot it in the process or an IESG member is using >> its power to change a document according to its personal beliefs. > > We've had that happen in a working group I chair and I do > think that it was the result of process failure in the > working group. That said, there seemed to be broad > agreement across the IESG that the document had certain > specific flaws I think that exemplifies well what the IESG should do. - I do think there's a problem if a single > IESG member can reject working group consensus and hold > up a document - it seems as if there should be wider > agreement that the document is too flawed to progress. > > Melinda > Yes. Best wishes, as