On 4/12/13 4:58 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote: > I just change the subject because I still beleive the problem with > review is in the WG not IESG. Some WGs have few reviews on each WG > document, that may not be bad, but I think having only one review or > comment (excluding authors) within a WGLC is wrong in a WG review > process. I think WG chair can find two participants to do it. It seems plausible. > > I recommend WG's process to change their purpose so we have to get *two > participants* which are not authors to review the work and comment > within WGLC (even small text comment is ok). I recommend WG chairs to > think about this proposal, if not then I will try write an I-D for this > and communicate with community. Possible we would need any how an I+D to change the process and mandate this new review. I haven't made my mind but it seems like a good idea. > > AB Regards as