Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tony Hansen <tony@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:12:45 -0700
Cc: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <515975CA.3020705@att.com> (Tony Hansen's message of "Mon, 01 Apr 2013 07:55:54 -0400")
User-agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)

Tony Hansen <tony@xxxxxxx> writes:

> I'm thinking the enhanced RFC format proposed below should be dubbed
> STEAM/PUNC.

And anyone that participates in said work would be "STEAMed".
-- 
Wes Hardaker
SPARTA, Inc.

References:
- STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin
  - From: Daniel Raft
- Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin
  - From: Tony Hansen

Prev by Date: RE: [savi] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-savi-threat-scope-06
Next by Date: Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin
Previous by thread: Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin
Next by thread: Re: STEAM: BOF proposal for Berlin
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]