On 2/2/13, Scott Brim <swb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What? How about RFC 5218? > > This is done all the time through the WG process, and it changes all the > time too, which is appropriate. Many WG open and close in IETF with no history-ID/report of such efforts including success or failur issues. If documents produced, new generation can benefit from these IDs AB