Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/01/13 20:34, "Abdussalam Baryun" <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>
allegedly wrote:

>I recommend that IETF WGs consider start an initial historical I-D
>including their memories of important process or design of protocols,
>at least each 20 years WG participants could document their technical
>involvement history within WG work.
>
>AB
>
>

What?  How about RFC 5218?

This is done all the time through the WG process, and it changes all the
time too, which is appropriate.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]