History of protocol discussion or process in WG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 02:34:57 +0100
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I recommend that IETF WGs consider start an initial historical I-D
including their memories of important process or design of protocols,
at least each 20 years WG participants could document their technical
involvement history within WG work.

AB

Follow-Ups:
- Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  - From: Scott Brim
- Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
  - From: Nick Hilliard

Prev by Date: Re: Reducing time to publication: was Re: FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way toRFCwith Running Code) to Experimental RFC
Next by Date: Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
Previous by thread: Re: When is a 3933 experiment necessary? [Was: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC]
Next by thread: Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]