Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
From: SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:37:46 -0800
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <50B7ECD1.5080302@wonderhamster.org>

Hi Spencer,
At 15:16 29-11-2012, Spencer Dawkins wrote:

In addition to the cases Adrian asked about, isn't there also thecase of an author/editor updating a draft that has already beendiscussed and then submitting it during IETF week?


Yes.

Regards,

-sm

References:
- When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
  - From: George, Wes
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
  - From: Barry Leiba
- RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
  - From: George, Wes
- RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
  - From: SM
- RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
  - From: Spencer Dawkins

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice
Previous by thread: Re: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
Next by thread: RE: When to adopt a draft as a WG doc (was RE: "IETF work is done on the mailing lists")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]