Same here. The decision is independent of Marshall's previous contributions. Cheers, Mehmet > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext Bert > Wijnen (IETF) > Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 3:15 PM > To: Olafur Gudmundsson > Cc: IETF-Discussion list > Subject: Re: Recall petition for Mr. Marshall Eubanks > > Thanks for extra info. > > You can add me to the list who sign the request for recall. > > Bert > > > --On Saturday, 03 November, 2012 11:36 -0400 Russ Housley > > <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> John: > >> > >>>> I assume at this point the IAOC would like to pursue the > >>>> recall option? If not, please be very clear about it to the > >>>> list as I haven't actually seen a request from the IAOC for > >>>> that process to proceed as far as I can tell. > >>> > >>> Because I am personally very reluctant to see this handled by > >>> recall, I want to ask a slightly different question: Are the > >>> people who met with Marshall convinced that he understood > >>> that, if he did not resign, a recall was almost certain to be > >>> initiated as our next step. If the answer is "yes", he's made > >>> his choice and I am ok with signing the petition. If not, it > >>> is possible that more discussion would be in order after the > >>> petition process is complete. > >>> > >>> I hope that, when Lynn accepts the petitions, another effort > >>> (or several) will be made to et Marshall's attention -- it > >>> presumably is not too late for him to resign until after the > >>> relevant committee is appointed. > >> > >> At the end of our visit, I believe that Marshall understood > >> that there were three possibilities: > >> > >> 1) Tell the community that he intends to resume participation; > >> 2) Resign; > >> 3) Do nothing, which would very likely result in a recall. > >> > >> Russ > > > > > > > > > >