Same here. I'm noncom-eligible and suppose the recall. Jason Livingood On 11/4/12 11:45 AM, "Arturo Servin" <arturo.servin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for the information to have a better decision. > > I am Nomcom-eligible and you can add me to the signature list. > > >/Arturo Servin > > >On 04/11/2012 12:15, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote: >> Thanks for extra info. >> >> You can add me to the list who sign the request for recall. >> >> Bert >> >>> --On Saturday, 03 November, 2012 11:36 -0400 Russ Housley >>> <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> John: >>>> >>>>>> I assume at this point the IAOC would like to pursue the >>>>>> recall option? If not, please be very clear about it to the >>>>>> list as I haven't actually seen a request from the IAOC for >>>>>> that process to proceed as far as I can tell. >>>>> >>>>> Because I am personally very reluctant to see this handled by >>>>> recall, I want to ask a slightly different question: Are the >>>>> people who met with Marshall convinced that he understood >>>>> that, if he did not resign, a recall was almost certain to be >>>>> initiated as our next step. If the answer is "yes", he's made >>>>> his choice and I am ok with signing the petition. If not, it >>>>> is possible that more discussion would be in order after the >>>>> petition process is complete. >>>>> >>>>> I hope that, when Lynn accepts the petitions, another effort >>>>> (or several) will be made to et Marshall's attention -- it >>>>> presumably is not too late for him to resign until after the >>>>> relevant committee is appointed. >>>> >>>> At the end of our visit, I believe that Marshall understood >>>> that there were three possibilities: >>>> >>>> 1) Tell the community that he intends to resume participation; >>>> 2) Resign; >>>> 3) Do nothing, which would very likely result in a recall. >>>> >>>> Russ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>