On 10/25/2012 12:21 PM, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 10/25/12 11:13 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >> First, I disagree with your belief that what you propose would not be >> retroactive. Second, it's worth pointing out that if the IAOC put an >> equal amount of effort into the recall procedure, the problem would be >> just as solved, without danger of repercussion. > > In the interest of progress, what do you think *should* be done? > Yesterday you said that you were not in agreement with declaring > the position vacant in this manner. Is it that you think that > Marshall should not be removed at all, that you think Marshall > should not be considered as having resigned, that you think ... ? > How do you think this should be resolved? I've said it many times already. Start the recall.