Re: don't overthink, was Just so I'm clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/25/12 11:13 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> First, I disagree with your belief that what you propose would not be
> retroactive. Second, it's worth pointing out that if the IAOC put an
> equal amount of effort into the recall procedure, the problem would be
> just as solved, without danger of repercussion.

In the interest of progress, what do you think *should* be done?
Yesterday you said that you were not in agreement with declaring
the position vacant in this manner.  Is it that you think that
Marshall should not be removed at all, that you think Marshall
should not be considered as having resigned, that you think ... ?
How do you think this should be resolved?

Melinda



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]