RE: Just so I'm clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Has anyone bothered to ask counsel for an opinion about the issues StJohns raised?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:47 AM
> To: Doug Barton
> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Just so I'm clear
> 
> On 24/10/2012 20:34, Doug Barton wrote:
> ...
> > ... Nothing in the text suggests an
> > unfettered right of creating new definitions of "vacant."
> 
> You mean, new compared to the first definition in Merriam-Webster.com?
> 
> 1: not occupied by an incumbent, possessor, or officer <a vacant office>
> <vacant thrones>
> 
> Objectively and factually, that seems to be the case. The IAOC is actually
> going an extra mile rather than simply informing NomCom that the seat has
> become vacant.
> 
>     Brian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]