Based on IETF LC comments, I'm returning this draft to the WG. Stay
tuned for another IETF LC in a couple of weeks.
spt
On 8/22/12 11:05 AM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Public-Key Infrastructure
(X.509) WG (pkix) to consider the following document:
- 'Updates to the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate
and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile'
<draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5280-clarifications-08.txt> as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-09-05. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document updates RFC 5280, the Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL)
Profile. This document changes the set of acceptable encoding
methods for the explicitText field of the user notice policy
qualifier and clarifies the rules for converting internationalized
domain name labels to ASCII. This document also provides some
clarifications on the use of self-signed certificates, trust anchors,
and some updated security considerations.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5280-clarifications/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pkix-rfc5280-clarifications/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
pkix mailing list
pkix@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix