On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:50 PM, SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> An I-D will only be removed from the public I-D archive in compliance >> with a duly authorized court order. If possible, a removed I-D will be >> replaced with a tombstone file that describes the reason that the I-D >> was removed from the public I-D archive. > > > I'll +1 the change (only for the IETF Stream) suggested by Alessandro > Vesely. > > Suggested text: > > An expired I-D will be removed from the public I-D archive when necessary. > Such action will be taken by request of an IESG member, a chair of the > working group associated with the I-D, or one of the document authors. > > If possible, a removed I-D will be replaced with a tombstone file that > describes the reason that the I-D was removed from the public I-D archive. +1 It might be prudent to add other details of the DMCA order as well. I have seen that other websites do that. This is a good FAQ on DMCA removal http://www.chillingeffects.org/copyright/notice.cgi?NoticeID=627#QID130 -- Vinayak (IANAL)