Re: Is the IETF aging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is the IETF aging?
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:58:05 -0700
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0CE35C09-274A-46B2-BFC6-28AEE45D2867@gmx.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Reply-to: dcrocker@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1

Howevermuch the answer to the Subject question was not true when thethread started, it's true now...


d/

--
 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net

References:
- Is the IETF aging?
  - From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
  - From: Hannes Tschofenig

Prev by Date: Re: Is the IETF aging?
Next by Date: Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
Previous by thread: Re: Is the IETF aging?
Next by thread: Re: Is the IETF aging?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]