Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 13:20 26-04-2012, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Internet Wideband Audio Codec WG
(codec) to consider the following document:
- 'Definition of the Opus Audio Codec'
  <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> as a Proposed Standard

Section 10 about "copying conditions" mentions "without royalty". There was a message to the CODEC mailing list about the Qualcomm IPR disclosure. The Licensing declaration in the Huawei IPR disclosures do not mention royalty-free. Was that taken into account by the authors for the statement in Section 10?

Could the authors please clarify what they mean by "the work" in the following:

  "The authors agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to
   copy, use and distribute the work (excluding Code Components
   available under the simplified BSD license)"

Regards,
-sm


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]