Re: Is the IETF aging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 27, 2012, at 16:41, Yoav Nir wrote:

>  Before 1950    2.9%
>  1950 - 1960   16.6%
>  1961 - 1970   33.7%
>  1971 - 1980   32.8%
>  After 1980    14.0%

Nice bell curve, יואב, but you can't pop that soap bubble of perception with the bluntness of raw data :-)

Maybe just the areas where PHB likes to work in are growing old? :-)

Many of the people doing the real work in CoRE are in their 20s, or have left that age range just recently.  And no, they aren't all academics.  I think we have a healthy age mix, with some pretty good gray-haired input as well.

I'm going to argue for an age column on the blue sheets so we get better data :-)

Grüße, Carsten

PS.: Please, don't take any of this seriously.  Except for the CoRE age statistics.
Dave Cridland's observations also definitely don't apply to CoRE, except that we do have the stunning range of experience that makes the IETF so valuable.

PPS.: Is the overall median really 42?




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]