Hi - > From: "Randy Bush" <randy@xxxxxxx> > To: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "IETF Disgust" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; "IESG" <iesg@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:04 AM > Subject: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments > > one aspect that may be missed is that there is a body of experimantal > documents which were not really experiments, but were classified as > such because of layer nine silliness. > > randy And if we look at the body of documents that have been reclasssified as historic, we also see that sometimes reclassification has nothing to do with the "experiment" being terminated (the protocols still in wide use) and can also only be reasonably explained as "layer nine silliness." Randy (a different one)