Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:04:55 +0200
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, IESG <iesg@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <111c01cd1ece$fa283e10$ee78ba30$@olddog.co.uk>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

one aspect that may be missed is that there is a body of experimantal
documents which were not really experiments, but were classified as
such because of layer nine silliness.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
  - From: Randy Presuhn

References:
- Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
  - From: Adrian Farrel
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
  - From: Eggert, Lars
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
  - From: Adrian Farrel

Prev by Date: RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Next by Date: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Previous by thread: RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Next by thread: Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]