It will be more work, but going to mixed connectivity solution
addresses the old, current and new. Going online will serve better
the rebirth on online connectivity, mixed bandwidths and smaller
devices. Using forums via web, newsgroups with email components has
long been part of the RFC-based MUA.
But even for companies that have gone with mixed connectivity with RFC
based and Online Web forums, going to Online web access may be
inevitable. Microsoft is a prime example after nearly 30 years it
abandoned the newsgroups for online forums early last year. To help
with the transition, several NNTP Bridges were written to allow for
users familiar with their favorite MUA Email/News Readers to use the
online forums. That is what I did when Microsoft migration NNTP
bridge was too poor. So I wrote WcLEX (Wildcat! Live Exchange)
http://opensite.winserver.com/wclex
There is plenty of open source BBS forums for the web that offers a
wide degree of group ware support features. Some many already have
component to allow members to receive list mail via email accounts
which came after much request to offer the "legacy" mode.
I suggest to keep the current mode, and look at Online BBS forums as a
migration, and it may also using calendaring many always come with and
also probably be able to augment the Online IETF Meeting efforts.
Go West.
---
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
Riccardo Bernardini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Francesco Gennai
<francesco.gennai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is this really a big enough problem to be worth solving? I can't
recall a single instance where I received IETF list with a problematic
attachment.
i travel to places with very poor bandwidth. �it is a problem.
and the vast majority of users just do not get it. �"we send 20mb
documents around the office all the time. �suck it up."
for who has problem in attachment downloading the solution should be
at the delivery Message Store level, where the strip of the attachment could be
done accordingly to an user configurable mailbox parameter
(as we do on our server, where we call it Easy Delivery).
Francesco
randy
A proposal: what about something configurable? Everyone already has a
personal "setup" page for his/her own mailman account. It would
suffice to add an option "send attachment as link," possibly with a
configurable threshold. Honestly, I do not anything about the
internal structure of mailman, so I do not know if this would be a
huge change (wrt the "pure link" solution) or not. But, you know,
"nothing is impossible if you do not have to do it..." :)
For me, I like the idea of using the link since, depending on where I
am, I work with different PCs. Because of this, I read the mail via
web services and I do not download it on my local disk. Large
attachments clog up my quota (do you see why I am using a gmail
account?). However, I understand the "dual" situation where people
download the mail on local disk and the "physical" attachment would
allow them to have the attachment even when offline.
Letting each one doing his/her choice looks like a good compromise to me.
Riccardo