Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It will be more work, but going to mixed connectivity solution addresses the old, current and new. Going online will serve better the rebirth on online connectivity, mixed bandwidths and smaller devices. Using forums via web, newsgroups with email components has long been part of the RFC-based MUA.

But even for companies that have gone with mixed connectivity with RFC based and Online Web forums, going to Online web access may be inevitable. Microsoft is a prime example after nearly 30 years it abandoned the newsgroups for online forums early last year. To help with the transition, several NNTP Bridges were written to allow for users familiar with their favorite MUA Email/News Readers to use the online forums. That is what I did when Microsoft migration NNTP bridge was too poor. So I wrote WcLEX (Wildcat! Live Exchange) http://opensite.winserver.com/wclex

There is plenty of open source BBS forums for the web that offers a wide degree of group ware support features. Some many already have component to allow members to receive list mail via email accounts which came after much request to offer the "legacy" mode.

I suggest to keep the current mode, and look at Online BBS forums as a migration, and it may also using calendaring many always come with and also probably be able to augment the Online IETF Meeting efforts.

Go West.

---
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com

Riccardo Bernardini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Francesco Gennai
<francesco.gennai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is this really a big enough problem to be worth solving? I can't
recall a single instance where I received IETF list with a problematic
attachment.
i travel to places with very poor bandwidth. �it is a problem.
and the vast majority of users just do not get it. �"we send 20mb
documents around the office all the time. �suck it up."

for who has problem in attachment downloading the solution should be
at the delivery Message Store level, where the strip of the attachment could be
done accordingly to an user configurable mailbox parameter
(as we do on our server, where we call it Easy Delivery).

Francesco


randy

A proposal: what about something configurable?  Everyone already has a
personal "setup" page for his/her own mailman account.  It would
suffice to add an option "send attachment as link," possibly with a
configurable threshold.  Honestly, I do not anything about the
internal structure of mailman, so I do not know if this would be a
huge change (wrt the "pure link" solution) or not.  But, you know,
"nothing is impossible if you do not have to do it..." :)

For me, I like the idea of using the link since, depending on where I
am, I work with different PCs.  Because of this, I read the mail via
web services and I do not download it on my local disk.  Large
attachments clog up my quota (do you see why I am using a gmail
account?).  However, I understand the "dual" situation where people
download the mail on local disk and the "physical" attachment would
allow them to have the attachment even when offline.

Letting each one doing his/her choice looks like a good compromise to me.

Riccardo




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]