On Thursday, March 15, 2012 02:28:00 PM Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 2012-03-15 13:33, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > ... > > > I suppose I could live with this - but not actively support it - if the > > stripping was limited to abusively large attachments - say ones over 5Mb > > or thereabouts. > > +0.9; maybe set the limit a bit lower, for those who still have network > capacity issues. However, it would be extremely inconvenient to have small > attachments stripped. > > > But otherwise it's a TERRIBLE idea, and will simply result in > > everyone including the draft or whatever in the primary message text in > > order to avoid this nonsense, which results in a degradation of list > > quality for all concerned. > > +1 +1 to it's a terrible idea. Scott K