On 2012-03-15 13:33, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
...
> I suppose I could live with this - but not actively support it - if the
> stripping was limited to abusively large attachments - say ones over 5Mb or
> thereabouts.
+0.9; maybe set the limit a bit lower, for those who still have network
capacity issues. However, it would be extremely inconvenient to have small
attachments stripped.
> But otherwise it's a TERRIBLE idea, and will simply result in
> everyone including the draft or whatever in the primary message text in order
> to avoid this nonsense, which results in a degradation of list quality for all
> concerned.
+1
Brian