Pete Resnick wrote: >>> and can be used by other >>> people who build sane equipment that understands "shared" addresses can >>> appear on two different interfaces. >> With so complicated functionality of NAT today, the only >> practical approach to build such equipment is to make it >> a double NAT > > Correct. Note that the double NAT, here, is AN equipment. >> Can IETF allocate such address? > > That's what this document is doing: Allocating address space to go > between 2 NATs. > > Maybe I don't understand your question? My point is that those who are arguing against the proposed allocation because of the capability of a double NAT equipment should argue for allocation of another space to enable development of the double NAT equipment. Masataka Ohta _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf